Pirate Queen Review

Members of the Broadway Community, take heart. That big hit musical you've been dreaming about since Cats is finally headed your way. With its luscious score and captivating story, The Pirate Queen could soon displace Wicked as the most sought-after theatre ticket in the country.

(Remember, you can always buy Pirate Queen tickets at TicketLiquidator.com even when it's sold out everywhere else.)

Built around the legend of 16th Century Irish hero Grace O'Malley, this tale of romance and empowerment challenges popular perceptions of women in a way that hasn't been done since Rosemary Harris stole every scene with her Tony-winning Eleanor of Aquitaine in The Lion in Winter.

The hero of the tale, you see, is a real, actual, complex human being. It's refreshing to see art that creates a female character who goes beyond what Hillary Rodham Clinton refers to as the "talking dog syndrome" (you don't expect a dog to speak at all so when it does you are impressed regardless of what it says... the same goes for women speaking well as leaders). The Pirate Queen rejects that simplistic view and instead paints a nuanced portrait of Grace that will resonate strongly with younger female audience members.

Certainly O'Malley was a feminist in every basic sense of the word, defying chauvinist stereotypes and living life on her own terms. Here on the stage her story is being told in a way that honors the power of women not merely as defiant tomboys, but also as nurturing mothers, level-headed politicians, fierce warriors and passionate lovers. All those things, at the same time, in the same woman. That's the insightful hand of two writers (both married heterosexuals, mind you...) who have woven into their story the many competing ideas of what a true heroine should look like. Their lead character alone, deftly play by Stephanie J. Block (The Boy from Oz, Wicked Nat'l Tour) is reason to see the show.

However, it's not only the feminist history that makes this show compelling. There's also a doomed love, a doting single father, a fair bit of swashbuckling and sword fighting, a deliciously regal Queen, a raucous cad, a marriage, a funeral, and a dastardly villain. The writers have blended all these elements with high aspirations and even higher production values to create a mythically-proportioned show that will keep you on the edge of your mezzanine level seat for every minute of the three hour run time.

The Pirate Queen will be the third big success for impresarios Boublil and Schoenberg, who famously co-wrote the timeless classics Les Miserables and Miss Saigon. They also, less famously, teamed up to create a big flop called Martin Guerre. Luckily, that failure seems to have been a creative anomaly. The Pirate Queen is poised to carry on the acclaimed legacy that began with Les Mis. Cleverly directed by Frank Galati (The Grapes of Wrath, Ragtime), the talented cast sings, and at times dances (Don't panic. It's not West Side Story), its way across a brilliantly fluid stage design courtesy of the legendary Eugene Lee (Wicked, Sweeney Todd, Candide).

Before I delve into details, there's a very important caveat here: the show is still in previews. When I saw it, it was still in the *first week* of previews. These things mature as they play to real audiences, and The Pirate Queen is still young. So if you see it now, take it with a grain of salt. And take this review as what it is meant to be-- observations about a work in progress that I conclude has incredible potential.

Because there is no spoken dialogue in the show, the songs do all the heavy lifting of exposition. This is a risky choice but an obvious one for Boublil and Schoenberg, who write all their shows this way. Schoenberg's music is, as usual, soaring and melodic, while Boublil's lyrics are at once narrative and expressive. The combination of the two is irresistible, but it presents a few problems of character development early in the show. I won't be giving anything away when I tell you that the first few songs ("All Aboard the Ceol Na Mara", "Here on this Night", "Battle at Sea") take us by the hand and hurry us through some requisite plot points in record time, leaving us breathless and slightly confused. After sitting for the first 20 minutes with eyebrow raised and a disappointed smirk beginning to form on the corner of my lip, however, I began to understand that chaotic opening is necessary to pave the way for the real journey to unfold. (Note to producers: It still needs some serious tweaking before you bring it to New York. See my notes at the bottom of this post).

And what a journey it is, wearing its heart on its sleeve in every song yet managing to stay comfortably short of cloying-- no small task in a theatre community that has most recently offered us such insultingly ill-developed musicals as Woman in White and Lestat. Dubhdara, masterfully played by Jeff McCarthy (Urinetown, Side Show) captivates in his role as Clan Chieftan and proud father of Grace O'Malley. The paternal relationship is, in fact, the strongest in the show, and it is obvious from the very beginning that Dubhdara and Grace have a deep, unshakable bond.

The relationship between Grace and her lover Tiernan is less convincing at the outset, but handsome, talented newcomer Hadley Fraser finds his stride in Scene 9 and brings a tear to every eye as he belts out "I'll Be There" (think Whitney Houston's "I Will Always Love You" with a heavy dose of testosterone). Through the rest of the show, Fraser develops Tiernan into a Bridges of Madison County lover almost worthy of our pirate queen's devotion. By the time this show opens on Broadway I expect the heat between Fraser and Block to be turned up a bit so we really believe in their love a little earlier in the show.

The leading lady's reluctant husband Donal, played by Marcus Chait (Urban Cowboy) hits the nail on the head with Schoenberg's rousing anthem "Boys'll Be Boys" to earn the defensive indignance of the entire audience. So well, actually, that he garnered less applause at curtain call than his counterparts... mostly because we still couldn't forgive his betrayal of Grace, even after the curtain went down and the house lights came on. I call that good acting.

In response to this inferior husband's attempt to control her, Stephanie J. Block as Grace sings what is possibly the best song in the show, "Because I am a Wife". Vacillating between despair and rage, she hits every note both musical and emotional, then ends the song in a defiant triumph. It's a difficult song to master and a crucial moment in the show. Kudos to Tara Rubin Casting for wooing a talent like Block who could carry such a part.

A more controversial female figure is Queen Elizabeth, played as comic aria by Linda Balgord. In the preview I saw, she had three songs that basically retrod the same path of Oh-Wow-It's-Cool-that-I'm-the-Queen-Now-and-I'm-Adjusting-to-this-Newfound-Power. (Note to producers: One is enough; two if they show more of a progression.) Even as the writers experiment to find the right balance for her important character, Balgord plays every inch the regal figure of a virgin queen with a cool comic edge and a reticent power. She enters the stage as a fairytale villain and ends the show with the respect of Grace and the audience. Her stage presence is buoyed by Martin Pakledinaz' (The Pajama Game) costumes for her and her ensemble court, which are an absolute delight. Forthcoming rewrites aside, Balgord takes on this edgy role with aplomb.

As for the lighting and effects design, the work of Messrs Kenneth Posner (Wicked, Hairspray) and Gregory Meeh (Cirque du Soleil) respectively, both are well conceived and flawlessly executed. Within Lee's stage design, these ambient elements of the set allow it to morph seamlessly from a pirate ship to a queen's court to a foggy moor and back again.

All told, The Pirate Queen boasts a stellar cast, an expert creative team and a potentially classic score. Admittedly, there are kinks to work out, but it's obvious in every aspect of this show that everyone involved is completed invested in making it the best musical possible. The raw materials are good, they're headed in the right direction, and they've convinced this reviewer that they've got what it takes to show up on stage at the 2007 Tonys.

Now, for the team behind The Pirate Queen, my notes:
(This first set of pointers is on the house, but if you want to send me a couple more tickets for the NYC opening you can get in touch by emailing pluggedin@ticketliquidator.com)

  • Alain and Claude-Michel, pay close attention to this first one, because nobody's ever said this to you before: it's too toned-down. You've obviously learned some lessons from your previous work, but streamlining your story and clarify the lines in this case leaves it a bit dead. Keep the clarity. In fact, continue the streamlining effort, but somehow I want a little more melodrama. For heaven's sake, this is musical theatre! More tears! More gasps! (from the audience, not the cast) Just don't get campy. It's a fine line to tread but I believe you can do it.

  • Go ahead and jump right into the assumption that Tiernan and Grania are already in love, but make us believe it a little bit more. Their recurring pledge of love song doesn't do it for me. Either they're desperately in love in the very first scene and we see the chemistry, or there's got to be more revealed about how and why they fall in love. So far it seems like they're just childhood friends with a little crush on one another.

  • How exactly did Grania earn the respect of the pirates? Something with the sail? That's not so clear but it's a key point. That storm scene would benefit from a little more spoken word. In fact, the first 30 minutes could do with a few more sentences. I know it's not your style, but it would help.

  • Also in the opening scenes, please remember the enormous value of a pause. Silence can be profound.

  • Dubhdara's injury during the first British ship invasion... he was grazed on the arm by a sword? That's what incapacitated him and caused him to cede command to his daughter? I don't think so. It's laughable. A pirate captain needs to be in life-threatening danger to hand over the wheel.

  • You have Dubhdara saying "If you weren't a woman Grace I'd put you in charge." and then, without missing a beat, Grace walks over to the crew of oarsmen and they name her captain. It doesn't make sense. He just said he'd like to but won't. So why does she then become captain anyway? How about "Grace, you may be a woman but you've got the heart of a pirate. You're the only one I trust to lead the men while I recover." You know... or something like that...

  • The queen's first three songs sound the same and are sort of difficult to understand. I get that we're seeing a girl become a queen, but it's boring and unnecessary. Keep one of them, then give her a more useful aria. I like the whole concept, but she needs better lines and more variation in music.

  • It might be too late and this is a minor point, but please get rid of the labels on the constellations when you put up that lovely starry night background. They're distracting and amateurish. Keep the outlines and everything else about it, just remove the text.

  • Why do you put Grania on top of a rock at the end of "Because I am a Wife"? The whole rock thing doesn't make much sense. Lose it.

  • "She, Who Has All" is a pretty and useful piece, but we need a lot more from the Queen to explain how she gets to that place before the duet. Maybe swap out one of those unnecesary earlier songs for a more introspective aria. You've made her a 3-dimensional character, and rightly so... don't be afraid to explore more of her.

Things you absolutely shouldn't touch:

  • The shipboard choreography for the oarsmen. Actually, everything about the ship set is spot-on. Don't touch it.

  • The pub scene with Donal and his rowdy friends.

  • Every Irish dance.

  • Everything about the relationship between Dubhdara and Grace.

  • Tiernan's solo.

  • Scene 12.

LOVED IT!

I saw this show TWICE the week before it closed and my mom and I absolutely loved it. The music is amazing and the costumes are outstanding. I have the shirt, the poster, the CD, and the color pamplet-thingy. I think it ended WAAAAAAAAAYYYYY too soon.

WOW you people

All i can say is i was amazed when i opened the paper and read all of the bad reviews Pirate Queen got. I have seen Pirate Queen twice that's right twice! And i am shocked to hear that people actually think that this show is the worst show they have ever seen. Well maybe they haven't seen a Broadway show before! It is not like Les Mis it's in Ireland like "hello"??? I saw it at the Hilton and absolutely loved it. NO one walked out or fell asleep. The connection was wonderful i would be dying to play opposite Hadley Fraser any day!! If anyone is wondering if they should see this show they should because it's not the first time people don't know what they are talking about.

ATTENDED MARCH 30TH PERFORMANCE. DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED.

This musical was so bad that it kept me up last night with thoughts of "how could this happen with all these talented people and all the money (maybe too much?) they had to pour into this montrous creation?"

First off, it's not a play or musical so much as something trying to be a Disney ride put to music. It is that shallow.
Really, I started to think the producers were in cahoots with Disney to creatie "PIRATE QUEEN! THE RIDE!!"

But wait, Disney would never have as vulgar and charmless drinking scene as you'll see in Pirate Queen. Add to that, it's smells of being a rehashed scene from Le Miz. In fact, most of Pirate Queen will sound familiar at times to those who have seen those beloved musicals Miss Saigon and Le Miz.

Everything you've read about the lack of compelling storyline and character development is true. Plus, it can't decide if it wants to be a dark, serious story or an over-the-top cartoonish romp.

Some of the set design (I refer to the kegs lite with lanterns outside the proscenium) seems like it was lifted straight out of the Pirates of the Carribean ride at Disney World. Unsophisticaed? Unrefined? Beyond belief.

True, the costumes are extraordinary. They held my attention when nothing else could. However, the costumes for the Court and Queen were so gaudy, comical and overstated that they seemed to have been conceived for Spamalot instead of a musical trying to make a serious point about female ability and power.

Which brings me to the ending. Ludicrous and pandering to women.

As for the standing ovations - well, that's become too common place these days and counts for little. The audience members front and center began to stand when the female lead appeared (she has a very demanding part and gives her all) so of course, others started to reluctantly stand. I did too, so I could get the h-ll out of the theater.
I've come to believe people are compelled to give standing ovations because it makes them happy and convinces them they've had a great night at the theater even when what they've seen is mediocore.

Oh. If only this musical were merely mediocore...I wouldn't have lost sleep over it.

Saw it in NY 3/28, evening performance

No spark. I don't know how to better to put it. The show is very "professional" but it has no spark. The audience seemed to follow suit and sat quietly throughout. As with many sung-through shows we often did not know when to applause. Later, when there was a time that was a clear applause break, we did not avail ourselves of it. The entire audience just sat hands-in- lap. There was so little character development that it became hard to care about these individuals. As I was sitting in the same theatre I saw "Ragtime" in (twice), watching a show directed, choreographed, and designed by the same creative team, I had to draw the conclusion that the real problem rests with the work and not the production. Some shows, like some movies, are bad enough to be good- this show is not. It is just bad enough to be bad.

The {Pirate Queen is about to Sink!

Inspite having very capable actors, who do everything in their power, to run the bilge pumps at maximum output, this vessel is taking on water at an excessive rate. It is completely off course and clearly headed for a watery grave along side other long submerged vessels in the ocean's depths. It may be wise for the Captain to skuttle the ship in a gallant attmpt to save the crew who truly have given their all to save the ship...the storm is brewing to "Tak'er Down". Unfortunate formula combination of Les Mis meeting Riverdance proves alll mathematical formula's do not work...10 + 10 = Zero!!!!!!!!!!!

SHIPWRECKED

I don't know who paid this reviewer off but The Pirate Queen is an enormous debacle!

The music is un-memorable, the voices cacophonous and the entire piece is reminiscent of Les Miz to where you half expect Jean Valjean to appear on stage and start singing. There are no bold sweeping showstoppers, there are a few "almost theres" but they never quite reach for the heights.

The one shining moment in all of this is Linda Balgord as the Virgin Queen, Elizabeth I. Her vocals soar above the rest of the cast and her final duet with the lead is only wrecked due to the clashing pitch and tone of Grace's voice.

This show was abysmal along the lines of "tick, tick... boom"! You would think the follow-up to one of Broadway's longest-running hits would rise to the occasion but it merely sinks to the bottom of the sea.

The Pirate Snoozer

I'm a huge fan of musical theatre - and sadly, this is right up there with the most boring. The music was ok, the acting was ok, everything was just 'ok'. I would not recommend spending money to see the show -- if you get free tickets, maybe... just maybe.

Tribune says Pirate Queen "Off Course"

http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/reviews/critics/chi-g202evc59.15oct29,1,7318347.story

Some quotes...

First off, the byline
By Chris Jones for the Chicago Tribune
Published October 30, 2006, 1:10 AM CST

'The Pirate Queen," the earnest and epic but ill-ruddered and oft-cartoonish voyage from the creators of "Les Miserables" and the producers of "Riverdance," is far from shipshape. How long its costly Irish sail will last in New York will depend upon the willingness of its creators to face potentially painful truths—beginning with a lack of clear commitment to the kind of legitimate, sophisticated, and, above all, complex musical that has marked Alain Boublil and Claude-Michel Schonberg's glorious careers to date.

These producers currently have a pre-Broadway show, which opened Sunday night after several weeks of previews, too dull and dour for the "Riverdance" or the family crowd, yet too full of predictable archetypes to function as the kind of weighty but broadly accessible musical of which this Broadway season is in dire need. They have a show about a potentially fascinating heroine, the titular 16th Century Irish freedom fighter Grace O'Malley, thorn in the side of Elizabeth I and adventurer of proto-feminist flamboyance and nationalist achievement, yet they garner perilously little emotional involvement from a willing Chicago audience hoping in vain to care as they once did for the Fantine of "Les Mis" or the Kim of "Miss Saigon."

(...cut...)

That may sound like more than enough to sink this ship. Perhaps. But these are brilliant, world-class artists—if they can stare down their own defenses—and they have things on their side. Most notable is Stephanie J. Block's central performance—a gutsy, powerful, honest piece of acting that will land her a Tony nomination, regardless of what happens to the show. And there are hints of a worthy score—the poignant "I'll Be There," the exciting "A Day Beyond Belclare," and, especially, "She, Who Has All," have the soaring melodies we associate with Schonberg.

(...cut...)

Time after time, though, you can see Block fighting the show's broad melodramatic strokes. We get precious little backstory on Grace—one of the show's serious problems—and we see far too little of her spirited youth. Her men—and this show is way too much about her men—are boiled down into good lover Tiernan (played by the boyish Hadley Fraser) and bad husband Donal (Marcus Chait, whom we know as villain the moment we see his hair). Much of the first act is dominated by Grace's father, Dubhdara (Jeff McCarthy) a conventionally drawn (if well-sung) type whom we know is going to croak somewhere around intermission and who gets too much in the way of his daughter.

Halfway through Act One, we get Grace's obliged marriage to Donal, whom we already despise (we first meet him in a tavern number that recalls the Gaston number from "Beauty and the Beast.")

(...cut...)

Which brings us to Queen Elizabeth—the most heinous aspect of "The Pirate Queen." Instead of providing us with insight into a famously quirky monarch, the show turns Linda Balgord into an Elizabethan fashion model, at times resembling a gilded but constricted butterfly and at others Beatrice Straight in "Poltergeist." She's also stuck with a harpsichord perennially bleating in the background, lest we forget this is a court.

(...cut...)

In its last half-hour—the best half-hour—the two women finally converse and "The Pirate Queen" belatedly takes shape. Despite her constrictions, the brilliant Balgord's rich emotional life bursts out of her costumes (if only she had more to say and sing! If only it weren't all so high!). The women start to sing of torn loyalties, women's power, life's compromises, the pain that flows from nationalist aggression. Even then, the show runs away from them, rendering their pivotal negotiation scene as a dumb show behind a screen. Such a shame. That's the conversation—the compromise that maybe saved lives and maybe caused generations of bloodshed—we came to weep over.

Sat in the front row on 10/24

My husband and I attended The Pirate Queen on Tuesday, October 24th and sat front row center. It was an incredible experience. Unlike the rest of those who have commented here, I actually really liked this show. It wasn't the best musical I've ever seen, but my husband and I thought it was really quite good.

Sitting so close allowed us to see the intricate detailing on all of the queens many gowns, which were amazing! Some great, memorable songs were "Rah-Rah, Tip-Top", "Boys'll Be Boys", "If I Said I Loved You", and "She, Who Has All". There were a few times when I felt like the company was shouting the songs at me, but I chalked that up to the fact that I was sitting so close. The bagpipe and harp in the orchestra were wonderful, and the Celtic singer (Aine Ui Cheallaigh) had a voice that was both soothing and haunting.

I felt a bit sorry for Marcus Chait, who actually received some "boos" during curtain call because of the unlikeable nature of his character. I thought all of the acting was superb. Yes, the show needs some polishing, but I think it will be a success. I'm curious to know what they've already changed since the first few preview shows, and what more will change before it hits Broadway.

We Walked Out

My husband and I went on Oct. 11th. We had high hopes, and like many of you, we were highly disappointed. We had no idea what was going on, the story didn't really make sense, I didn't feel any attachment to any of the characters, there weren't any good songs, and with all of the Riverdance touting, we expected amazing dancing. After the Queen came out for a third time and rattled our eardrums, we got up and left. We are huge musical theater fans, and I've never felt compelled to just waste two $80 tickets before. I think there is potential, but it needs a lot of work.

WOW you people

i give full suport to all the people who thought that Pirate Queen was a great play because i thought it was too. Well all i can say is that for those people who thought they waisted their money i am sorry for them because it was a amazing play!! I did not see one person walk out when i went to see the show not one seat was empty.And not one person was not laughing. And yes their was attachment to many of the characters don't ask me why no one could see that!!! I would be dying to be playing opposite Hadley Fraser any day. I am sorry to hear that the Queen rattled your ear drums which i don't think someone would hire her if that was the intention of the role. To me she amazed me with the power of her voice. And like many other people i have talked to Pirate Queen was a great experiance for my family to see and quess who is going agian on thursday?!?!

Needs Serious Work

I do think what was really lacking from this show was a song that really stood out, or anything that really grabbed the audience. I thought it was a good start, but I think some things need to be reworked before it goes to NY.

A lot of the music seems to be going for evoking waves by doin a slow rise and fall, but in the end this is just lulling the audience to sleep. The Celtic peices that are thrown in are beautiful, more of that would be lovely. There need to be more fast paced songs earlier on, and it might be nice to throw in a few more laughs here and there.

Also, I thought Queen Elizabeth was terrible (I saw it 10/20). Her vibrato was practically vibrating her head off, and I can understand how this could be an interesting comic device but it isn't good singing, and it makes her very difficult to understand. I think the same effect could be done with a little less vibrato and more presence. (And maybe she could avoid destroying her voice as well.)

And I think the entire first 20 minutes needs to be reblocked, and the songs looked at. There is far too much "and now we face the audience and SING VERY LOUD" With so much of that in the beginning it leaves very little places for the audience to build to. At this point, we have no idea what is going on, or why we should care, and having a bunch of men sing at us very loudly is unlikely to make us care. I agree that a lot of what is accomplished there could be done through dialogue, and then built into song as the musical progresses.

Also, I can swordfight better than that. Perhaps the fight choreography needs to be rehearsed more vigourously, since it plays such a large role in the show.

I enjoyed the show, and I think it could be amazing, as it is now I think it will die on broadway.

Really bad...

I just saw this on Saturday with my wife (we both love musicals) and we both HATED it.

It is slow paced, runs too long (over 2:45) and never enticed the audience.

Also, there was not one "humm-able" song in the entire show. Not a single "Wow!" song or moment either. That is not just my opinion, that was the opinions of everyone sitting in our area.

The best scenes were the few and far between dance scenes. I know this is a musical but with so many mentions of Riverdance in their advertising, most everyone expected a little more.

Some other scenes were farcical (in a bad way), Grace swordfighting moments after giving birth, the "Matrix-like" swordfight screne with slow motion flying pirates clashing mid-air, Grace's dad ceding control of the ship to her after the first swordfight scene, I could go on, but you get the gist.

Finally, I must say this is the first and only musical I have hated. I don't use that word ofter, but this was that bad. I went to this with high hopes and, unfortunately, it would not even had reached mediocre hopes. This show will not last long on Broadway...

I was at the same show as

I was at the same show as you on Saturday the 21st. I have never been so disappointed in a musical in my long, musical-going life! Just when the actors would begin a dance and I assumed a great Irish dance number was about to be seen, it was over in 30-40 seconds. Very frustrating!

I couldn't understand the Queen's lyrics, the scenes were choppy and we flew through history at break-neck speed without much explanation for events along the way. I also thought the sword fight right after giving birth was laughable. Wearing a blood-soaked night gown made it all the worse.

As we left the theater, I turned to my husband and said, "I give it 6 months on Broadway."

We'll see.

sword fight after giving birth

this really happened to Grace O'Malley, much of the show is based on actual events.

Re: dancing did you not see the whole wedding scene, quite a bit of Irish Dancing there as well as the pub scene, the christening scene and of course, the finale. I do agree the Queen scenes need much work and perhaps someone who can handle the high notes a little easier and with clarity in diction.

Yet another inconsistency is

Yet another inconsistency is that the musical portrays Donal as the "villain" who betrays her to Bingham when actually, they were married (and had three kids together) until his death at sea - they were married for 19 years at the time of his death...and she was not captured for another 20 years -- at the age of 56.

Also, there was no "Tiernan" - the person who gave up his freedom so that she could go free after her capture was not her young love, but instead was her son-in-law.

Actually according to many

Actually according to many accounts the battle after she gave birth to one of her sons was actually the following day and she shot the Turkish pirates who were attacking.
http://www.rootsweb.com/~nwa/grace.html (Here's a link to one of my sources...)
So that scene was inaccurate in three ways, a) not the same day, b) gun, not sword and c) Turkish, not British...

You give it that

You give it that long?

Chicago critics will see it next week and will rip it apart. New York audiences will know ahead of time that the show is bad and will stay away.

The show has been sold out many nights in Chicago because other than message board like this one, nobody is talking about it yet, but the word is spreading. Much of the ticket sales were done in advance and have slowed considerably over the past few weeks...

Needs Big Time Work

My wife and I along with another couple were also at Saturday night (21st) performance. We're from Boston and all love theater. We all absolutely agree with all the previous comments. The only one we all felt missing was that the music (aside from the Irish music which was wonderful)was derivative. If you closed your eyes(and sometimes you didn't have to) it felt like we were in the middle of Les Miserables. And with no memorable songs. We'd also rather have had Grace betrayed by some disgruntled sailor than through the forced marriage. Hated the love triangle. Hated Queen Elizabeth's portrayal and singing. With major work it may be rehabilitated. It's no wonder the Chicago critics haven't seen it yet.

Derivative?

Please. Imagine your favorite composer/songwriter, say, for instance, it's Tchaikovsky. Then imagine listening to his first piano concerto and enjoying it. Then, later, you hear concerto #3, close your eyes in the middle, and think "what a rip-off! This sounds like a blasted Tchaikovsky piano concerto!"

Composers have a style -- somehow it's fashionable to blast any modern composer as "deriviate" if said composer's work has anything in common with itself. It's bizarre to expect composers to be astylistic.

On reviews of The Pirate Queen in general... Current audiences seem to go to musicals for a few laughs and fun entertainment. We have lost a profound sense of music appreciation in this country -- a serious music-al based on interesting music doesn't go over well with audiences who fundamentally enjoy spoken-word theater and play music as background noise to accompany everyday life. Good music, and by inclusion quality musical theatre, demands active listening and an aesthetic sense that is increasingly hard to find in our entertainment-oriented Hollywood culture.

I've yet to see a review of this music-al that intelligently discusses the music.

Music???

Music is completely subjective so to discuss a musical on the basis of just the music is doing the acting and dancing and set design a disservice. There is more to it than just music. But I saw it and I will take your challenge.

Look at it this way. Jazz musicians argueably may be some of the finest musicians out there. But I have tried and tried again to listen and enjoy jazz and I can't no matter if it is Charlie Parker, Miles Davis, John coltrane....or Joe Blow at the neighborhood supper club.

As far as this musical ....it was a nice afternoon....will I go again...NO...as far as the MUSIC....would I buy the soundtrack.....NO WAY.

Steve from Chicago

Just Boring

I agree with you that I think America has lost its ability to appreciate music. But unfortunately a musical is a business, and if bores the audience no one is going to go despite how "technically" good the music is.

Besides, how do we define "good" music? If we are going to define it based on its difficulty, well then this show fails parlously, the melody's were typical musical fare, easy in range and easy to sing. I didn't pay much attention to the music structure.

But in my opinion good music should inspire and reach the soul. Even someone with no appreication for the technicalities of opera music can still feel inspired by an aria from a great opera, because the music has feeling and is beautiful. But the music from this show wasn't inspiring, it wasn't beautiful, it was just boring.

Rude People

I think all of you need to take into account that the Chicago shows were simply previews. I think the author of this article had a fabulous take on the show. Was there really a need for all of you (minus a select few) to bash the musical when the article states criticism? It's rather rude to bash someones talent that they have worked so hard for. Again, it was a preview, did you expect perfection? And another thing, to those who walked out, you are extremely disrespectful and shouldn't be seeing shows in the first place.

Not Rude...

...just expecting to get our money worth...

If they charge us full price for a Broadway calibre show, we expect a show that us fully Broadway worthy.

Here in Chicago many pre-Broadway shows have premiered before going to NYC...and they have been perfect...The Producers and Spamalot come to mind...

The Pirate Queen - second week show

I thought the production was great, but the story was boring. They could have done so much more to make it exciting. What a life Grace really had and it was played down in this production. The Queen scenes were boring and should be cut; yes, the costumes were outstanding. I also could not understand a lot of the words in the songs and we did have good seats.

I know the play will change many times before NY so I do wish it success.

We are going tonight

yikes i hope that these bad reviews will bring our hopes down so that we will have low expectations thus enjoy it!!!

my mother in law came in from japan and my wife and i rushed to find a broadway musical. Wicked was sold out so we went with the one that said, Riverdance meets Les Miserable.

I hope i didnt waste 100+ dollars for our 3 tickets!!!

Saw It On Broadway 3/12/07

What a disaster. They took the fascinating character of Grace O'Malley and made her into a simpering Disney princess:dead mother, lots of hair, little-girl belter voice, "spunky" and tomboyish -- what a bore. Stephanie Block looks and acts just about as Irish as Barbra Streisand does. The problem with casting shows like this is that you have to find a leading lady with such pipes of steel, you can't look for someone who can act AND sing. Ms.Block has an AMAZING voice. But she can't overcome the one-dimensional, totally cliched character she's being forced to play.

The writers also ruined the historical Queen Elizabeth, totally undercutting all the mystique of her regal majesty they've spent two numbers establishing and giving her a dreadful, treacly second act duet with Grace wherein she reveals that her childless, unmarried life is "nothing." OH, PLEASE. Exactly whose sexist fantasy is this, anyway? We're talking about Queen Elizabeth here!!

This show was a massive disappointment. It should have been dark and savage and wild and thrilling but it was tame, dull, overwrought, cliched and embarrassingly corny. All the dramatic and musical devices they rely on here were already wrung dry in "Les Miz."

The cast gives it their energetic all, but honestly... this ship is bound to sink, or American audiences are bigger suckers than I thought.

what?

if you EVER criticize Stephanie J. Block by calling her a little girl belter, you don't know what you're talking about. have YOU ever been on broadway? didn't think so.

Say it ain't so!

I was looking forward to checking out The Pirate Queen on my next trip down to NYC, but after reading these reviews I think I'll wait till this megashow sinks or swims.
Crossing my fingers for the latter.

Morgan
Halifax, Nova Scotia

Pirate Queen NYC

I saw the play this past weekend in NYC.

The play, the acting and the music were wonderful!! Everyone in the theatre loved the performance. No one walked out. A fantastic play to see. See if for yourself and decide.

I am planning to see it again soon!!

The Pirate Queen

Thank you for your support of the play. We are going to see it soon. I am sure that it is not as simply written off as some of these reviewers have done. These are wonderful producers with a great motive to share these noble Irish characters, lessons from history, accomplished writers and directors .... with the world. Please give them your patience, support and constructive criticism so that it will succeed in it goal.

Lessons from History indeed...

Hate to break it to you but perhaps you might want to read more. This play is nothing close to historical. In fact the historical background is mutilated for the convience of the script.